1) ESPN.com is a perfect website. When you first glance at the page, you see the top stories and a photo to draw you in. At the very top you have the days scores also with the upcoming games/events for the day. The scores are always up to date. It also allows you to personalize your page to your favorite teams and players. It has multiple interactions for the viewers, like questions. Not to mention all the information about sports, thats just an easy click away.
2) Packers.com is another good web design, due to its web layout and it attracts its audience in a positive way. It is similar to ESPN.com, because it has the days top stories with photos and captions that rotate periodicly. Without scrolling down you get the days top events, the next game, top press confrences, and all the neccessary links. It utilizes all space and puts the most interesting and needed information at the top of the page.
mookiehockey1 Said:
on January 15, 2010 at 6:26 pm
I think you a intelligent young man with a lot to say. This post was insightful with a dash of excitement. The way you put your words together, excites me. I am a sports fan and completely agree with your statement. You have a bright future ahead of you and I cant wait to see the rest of your work about sports and blogging.
me Said:
on January 15, 2010 at 6:29 pm
cool commentary !
what sites do you think are bad example of sports web pages ?
its great when a web site makes it easy to acess all the new and recent info on the homne page like you said about the sports stats
skaggsandrew Said:
on January 15, 2010 at 6:33 pm
Charles Woodson is the most overrated player in the NFL. Aaron Rodgers can’t win the big game. Greg Jennings has been a complete bust. Go Lions!
cwilms Said:
on January 15, 2010 at 6:37 pm
Thank you for your comment, but we all know that your joking considering those players are all legends in the NFL today. What you should of said is that Chris Johnson and the entire Miami football team, mostly Jacory Harris are considered the scrubbiest of the scrubs. Once again thanks for comment.